<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Customers Defect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinsightadvantage.com/why-customers-defect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinsightadvantage.com/why-customers-defect/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ A. Hatfield Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.theinsightadvantage.com/why-customers-defect/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ A. Hatfield Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinsightadvantage.com/?p=684#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Great reminder, Mary, that a defected (ex-)customer can offer a wealth of insight into your business. To not re-engage them -- even some defined segment of them -- is simply insane, especially in this economy.

You said: &quot;Identify someone in your organization to track and respond promptly to both positive and negative comments.&quot; I agree with this. Though, I would emphasize the need to put some thought into just HOW you will be responding. If you&#039;re going to engage these customers via social media you need to be ready to act on at least some portion of the responses -- even if it&#039;s to effectively say &quot;We&#039;re sorry, but we can&#039;t do anything about that&quot;. To have failed them once is bad...but to deliberately seek their thoughts out and then to not follow-through at all is even worse. If you&#039;re going to ask &quot;Why did you leave&quot;, &quot;How did we not satisfy you?&quot; or something similar, be ready to respond.

Also, among your suggestions for ways to &quot;understand your customers’ expectations while they are still with you&quot; -- all of which are great! -- I would add the regular gathering and analysis of information from your call center, customer service, technical support or similar post-sales contact centers. 99% of contacts to these functional areas are because something went wrong, is not working, etc. It&#039;s a GREAT and proactive way to see where the friction and pain-points are for your customers WHILE they are still customers. Build self-help, FAQs to get some quick wins, and integrate this feedback into the product development/R&amp;D process to design resolutions(fixes) directly into the next version of your product.

Great actionable thoughts, Mary.

Thanks!
Russ
Seattle, WA
http:///www.twitter.com/russhatfield</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reminder, Mary, that a defected (ex-)customer can offer a wealth of insight into your business. To not re-engage them &#8212; even some defined segment of them &#8212; is simply insane, especially in this economy.</p>
<p>You said: &#8220;Identify someone in your organization to track and respond promptly to both positive and negative comments.&#8221; I agree with this. Though, I would emphasize the need to put some thought into just HOW you will be responding. If you&#8217;re going to engage these customers via social media you need to be ready to act on at least some portion of the responses &#8212; even if it&#8217;s to effectively say &#8220;We&#8217;re sorry, but we can&#8217;t do anything about that&#8221;. To have failed them once is bad&#8230;but to deliberately seek their thoughts out and then to not follow-through at all is even worse. If you&#8217;re going to ask &#8220;Why did you leave&#8221;, &#8220;How did we not satisfy you?&#8221; or something similar, be ready to respond.</p>
<p>Also, among your suggestions for ways to &#8220;understand your customers’ expectations while they are still with you&#8221; &#8212; all of which are great! &#8212; I would add the regular gathering and analysis of information from your call center, customer service, technical support or similar post-sales contact centers. 99% of contacts to these functional areas are because something went wrong, is not working, etc. It&#8217;s a GREAT and proactive way to see where the friction and pain-points are for your customers WHILE they are still customers. Build self-help, FAQs to get some quick wins, and integrate this feedback into the product development/R&amp;D process to design resolutions(fixes) directly into the next version of your product.</p>
<p>Great actionable thoughts, Mary.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Russ<br />
Seattle, WA<br />
<a href="http:///www.twitter.com/russhatfield" rel="nofollow">http:///www.twitter.com/russhatfield</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

